why is nco#imID not a subpropery of nie:identifier?

[leosauermann]

see http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/nco/#imID

should be a nie:identifier? or?

[antonimylka]

Indeed. It would especially useful for contacts obtained by crawling IM contact list, where the IM identifier is acutally the identifier of the contact.

Will do

[antonimylka]

I looked at it. Actually not. nie:identifier is a property of an informationElement. imID is not a property of a contacdt, but a property of a contact medium, the same way a telephone number (also a unique identifier, for which a well-defined standardized URI scheme exists RFC 3966) is not a nie:identifier, but a property of a contact medium (TelephoneNumber)

This was a design decision. Right now making this change would force all IMAccounts to be information elements. Too big a consequence.

I close this as wontfix

[leosauermann]

hm, I am happy about the answer, but not content :-)

ok, so informationelement is wrong, ack.

but still we can make nco:imId a sub-property of nao:identifier ?!

this would be a first step to make the ContactMedium a way to match people together.

[antonimylka]

done, in revs [8930], [8931] and [8932] please confirm

[leosauermann]

I reviewed, changes are fine, PIMO got jumbled. I close this ticket and us two know how to fix the HTML rendering of PIMO "later" :-)